A thorough analysis of the current criteria regarding the Decree on the Evaluation and Grading of Academic Exams entails a pertinent examination of its ratio legis, that is, the motives and reasons that justify it. If we take into account that the foundation inspiring its content and scope is based on rectifying the excessive regulation and rigidity over the evaluation of exams submitted by students, the arbitrariness not permitted under material protection implies, by means of an additive clause, a progressive elimination of such excesses, which coincides with the favorable framework of the development of new technologies. The procedure for assessing exams, in order to achieve a sense of absolute justice, will be free from any kind of arbitrariness that undermines its execution. The aim of perfect transparency in this vital process within the academic environment relieves teachers of responsibility, as it removes various obsolete correction procedures, appeals, or administrative processes. The main foundation of a renewed system is obviously directed towards test-type and mathematical exams that avoid both the excessive involvement of the teacher and the unnecessary complaints of the student. Thanks to instant access to the virtual world, students would have the option of automatic verification of their exams and tests, through photographs with their mobile phones or scanning, on platforms established for this purpose. The prior knowledge of the correction criteria, disclosed well in advance, fosters an atmosphere of full clarity in which the teacher becomes a co-participant in hypothetical corrections.

- ON THE BASIS OF DELIBERATE REASONING AND A VOCATION FOR JUSTICE, WE STATE WITHOUT ANGER THAT: